> On 10 Jul 2026, at 02:12, Fujii Masao <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2026 at 4:56 PM Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> wrote: >> I like this suggestion, though I think it should go after the call to >> pgstat_progress_update_param since the db in question reached >> ProcessDatabase. >> I would add it as an else-if case to the conditional testing we have for >> _FAILED and _ABORTED. > > Thanks for the review! I've updated the patch based on > your and Horiguchi-san's suggestions.
+1, v2 LGTM. -- Daniel Gustafsson
