On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 7:31 AM Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> wrote: > A more likely scenario is that you are hacking in this code and have made > silly > errors. It mostly seemed consistent with how the forknum error is reported, > but is not important.
Upon reflection, it occurred to me that I would probably rather have the chunk offset than the chunk size if this ever trips, so I added both to the error message. Here's v2. > No disagreement there, which is why I tried to get it reviewed quickly so it > can be applied and forgotten about and we can move on to more important > matters. Thanks for reviewing. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
v2-0001-Add-additional-sanity-checks-when-reading-a-blkre.patch
Description: Binary data
