> On 15 Jul 2026, at 17:36, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 7:31 AM Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> wrote: >> A more likely scenario is that you are hacking in this code and have made >> silly >> errors. It mostly seemed consistent with how the forknum error is reported, >> but is not important. > > Upon reflection, it occurred to me that I would probably rather have > the chunk offset than the chunk size if this ever trips, so I added > both to the error message. Here's v2.
LGTM, +1 on applying. -- Daniel Gustafsson
