On October 9, 2018 6:58:18 AM PDT, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >On 25/09/2018 02:23, Andres Freund wrote: >>> My point was just to reduce the number of variables used and ease >>> debugger lookups with what is on the stack. >> I'm not sure a bitflag really gives you that - before gdb gives you >the >> plain value, afterwards you need to know the enum values and do bit >math >> to know. > >You could use an actual C bit field, to make debugging easier. See Tom's reply to this suggestion... Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
- Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring Chris Travers
- Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring Michael Paquier
- Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring Chris Travers
- Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactorin... Chris Travers
- Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refact... Chris Travers
- Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refact... Andres Freund
- Re: Proposal for Signal Detection R... Michael Paquier
- Re: Proposal for Signal Detection R... Andres Freund
- Re: Proposal for Signal Detection R... Michael Paquier
- Re: Proposal for Signal Detection R... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: Proposal for Signal Detection R... Andres Freund
- Re: Proposal for Signal Detection R... Tom Lane
- Re: Proposal for Signal Detection R... Michael Paquier
- Re: Proposal for Signal Detection R... Tom Lane
- Re: Proposal for Signal Detection R... Michael Paquier
- Re: Proposal for Signal Detection R... Tom Lane
- Re: Proposal for Signal Detection R... Michael Paquier
- Re: Proposal for Signal Detection R... Andres Freund
- Re: Proposal for Signal Detection R... Michael Paquier
- Re: Proposal for Signal Detection R... Chris Travers
- Re: Proposal for Signal Detection R... Michael Paquier