> On 29 Jul 2026, at 21:27, Tristan Partin <[email protected]> wrote: > > I was reading some buffile.c code, and I noticed some hand-rolled > versions of repalloc_array() (minus the multiplication check). Since we > already have one usage of repalloc_array() in buffile.c for > BufFile::files, I figured it would probably be alright if we used it in > the other two locations as well.
+1 for the concept, but I wonder why these weren't covered by 1b105f9472bdb? -- Daniel Gustafsson
