> > I was reading some buffile.c code, and I noticed some hand-rolled > > versions of repalloc_array() (minus the multiplication check). Since we > > already have one usage of repalloc_array() in buffile.c for > > BufFile::files, I figured it would probably be alright if we used it in > > the other two locations as well. > > +1 for the concept, but I wonder why these weren't covered by 1b105f9472bdb?
hmm, right. specifically 1b105f9472bdb bulk updated buffile.c. Only explanation I see is they were missed in a large update. -- Sami
