On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 4:29 PM Masahiko Sawada <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 1:10 PM Tristan Partin <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > UUIDv6 is the same as UUIDv1 with some fields reordered. We already
> > supported UUIDv1, so let's add support for UUIDv6. Previously, calls to
> > uuid_extract_timestamp() would return NULL for UUIDv6 values.
> >
> > Patch 2 only adds comments. I think the bit manipulation is worthy of
> > comments, but others may disagree.
>
> Thank you for the patch!
>
> The patch seems reasonable to me. I'll review the patch in depth.
>

I've reviewed the v1 patches and the 0001 patch looks good to me. I
have one comment for the 0002 patch:

+       /*
+        * UUIDv1 splits the 60-bit Gregorian timestamp into three fields that
+        * are *not* stored most-significant-first (see RFC 9562 sec. 5.1):
+        *
+        *  time_low  (bits 0-31)   octets 0-3, the least significant 32 bits
+        *  time_mid  (bits 32-47)  octets 4-5, the middle 16 bits
+        *  time_high (bits 48-59)  octet 6 low nibble + octet 7, the most
+        *                          significant 12 bits (octet 6 high nibble
+        *                          holds the version and is masked off)
+        *
+        * Reassemble the timestamp by shifting each field back to its place.
+        */

pgindent destroys these field tables. We need to tell pgindent to
leave the block alone by adding the dashed comment form:

    /*----------
     * UUIDv6 is a field-compatible reordering of UUIDv1 that stores the
     ...
     *----------
     */

Or I guess that this part doesn't necessarily need to be such a
format. Simply writing it like follow would work too:

/*
 * UUIDv1 stores the 60-bit Gregorian timestamp in three fields that
 * are *not* in most-significant-first order (RFC 9562 sec. 5.1):
 * octets 0-3 hold the least significant 32 bits, octets 4-5 the
 * middle 16, and octet 6's low nibble plus octet 7 the most
 * significant 12.  Octet 6's high nibble is the version, masked off
 * below.  The shifts put each field back in its place.
 */

Regards,

-- 
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com


Reply via email to