On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 08:11:04AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Users tend to ignore entirely WARNINGs in my experience, but it also > sounds to me that it is better to inform if the stats view has been > incremented at all even if only one page was iffy, starting at > strictly more than 0, not strictly more than 1 because the information > is still useful.
In order to close the loop, I have been doing some archeology. I can track the original code change in the v5 posted here, which has been using a (> 1) for the sake of the plural message, at least that feels like the author's intention: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20180331125404.GA20852%40nighthawk.caipicrew.dd-dns.de I would still just adjust the one-off in the if condition at the end. Reporting also a WARNING even if we have 1 checksum failure feels like the right thing to do. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
