> I can track the original code change in the v5 posted here, which has > been using a (> 1) for the sake of the plural message, at least that > feels like the author's intention:
I read the intention there differently, as errmsg_plural has been available since 2009. > I would still just adjust the one-off in the if condition at the end. > Reporting also a WARNING even if we have 1 checksum failure feels like > the right thing to do. I did that in v2, I also adjusted the total warning I mentioned earlier.
v2-0001-Report-single-page-checksum-failures-in-pg_stat_d.patch
Description: Binary data
