> On 18 Aug 2026, at 14:42, Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 18 Aug 2026, at 14:39, Bertrand Drouvot <[email protected]> >> wrote: > >> Shouldn't hit be incremented only when the injection point is attached? > > Good point, will fix. > >> + checksum ^= checksum; >> >> That's same as "checksum = 0". That works because 0 is not a valid value but >> was the intend to "checksum ^= 1"? to express that we want a different >> checksum? > > Ugh, sorry, I didn't notice that I hadn't replaced my debugcode before > generating the patch, I blame the lack of caffeine this morning.
I ended up settling for setting the checksum to zero since it also makes the checksum predictable, and with that pushed and backpatched. -- Daniel Gustafsson
