On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 08:28:52AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > Seems reasonable. Are there any consumers of the buffer who hardcode an > assumption of its size which could use .lookaheadSize instead? I'll revist > this on Sunday when I get back in the office unless beaten to it.
Please feel free to not wait for me. Thanks! -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
