> On 22 Aug 2026, at 01:52, Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 08:28:52AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> Seems reasonable. Are there any consumers of the buffer who hardcode an >> assumption of its size which could use .lookaheadSize instead? I'll revist >> this on Sunday when I get back in the office unless beaten to it. > > Please feel free to not wait for me. Thanks!
Committed, thanks. -- Daniel Gustafsson
