On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 08:53:47AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Perhaps out-of-core code or extensions could make use of this API, but > in my experience this usually points at possible optimizations in the > backend core code. I'd suggest to look at that first, perhaps, if > you'd like to make LockHasWaiters() fast-path safe?
Oh, I have missed the argument about autoprewarm and pg_prewarm on this thread: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALj2ACXXx9TwYzeP0cRnZKHz60yOYivcG7yiV=2ftc5chsv...@mail.gmail.com Sorry about that. I'd be curious about a different case where this could be used. Without the other proposal this feels a bit dead when taken independently.. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
