Hi, On Tue, Sep 1, 2026 at 9:55 PM Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 08:53:47AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > Perhaps out-of-core code or extensions could make use of this API, but > > in my experience this usually points at possible optimizations in the > > backend core code. I'd suggest to look at that first, perhaps, if > > you'd like to make LockHasWaiters() fast-path safe? > > Oh, I have missed the argument about autoprewarm and pg_prewarm on > this thread: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALj2ACXXx9TwYzeP0cRnZKHz60yOYivcG7yiV=2ftc5chsv...@mail.gmail.com > > Sorry about that.
Thanks for taking a look at it. > I'd be curious about a different case where this > could be used. > Without the other proposal this feels a bit dead when > taken independently.. I haven't looked into other cases where this could be used independently. For now, I will move this to the other thread as a 0001 patch and close this thread's CF entry. -- Bharath Rupireddy Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
