On Wed, Sep 9, 2026 at 8:26 AM Amit Langote <[email protected]> wrote: > > That still leaves your concern about whether the per-row path is > sufficiently solid for v19. The snapshot fixes and Amit's recent > collation report show that there are differences from SPI that we (I) > missed. The proposed collation fix falls back to SPI when the > referenced index and column collations differ. I still propose > retaining the per-row path, but agree that its readiness needs to be > assessed separately from the decision to remove batching.
I think a good start would be to revert the batching ASAP so that we can consider the state after independently. - Melanie
