On Wed, Sep 9, 2026 at 11:41 AM Melanie Plageman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 9, 2026 at 8:26 AM Amit Langote <[email protected]> wrote: > > That still leaves your concern about whether the per-row path is > > sufficiently solid for v19. The snapshot fixes and Amit's recent > > collation report show that there are differences from SPI that we (I) > > missed. The proposed collation fix falls back to SPI when the > > referenced index and column collations differ. I still propose > > retaining the per-row path, but agree that its readiness needs to be > > assessed separately from the decision to remove batching. > > I think a good start would be to revert the batching ASAP so that we > can consider the state after independently.
+1. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
