On Thu, Sep 17, 2026 at 7:53 PM Manuel Reyes Bravo <[email protected]> wrote: > > vignesh C <[email protected]> wrote: > > That seems better, here is an updated v3 version to handle the same. > > Same patch applies on pg19 branch and tests passes in both the > > branches. > > v3 no longer has the temporary table test that v2 added, I assume because > the pg_temp_N number depends on the backend. stats_ext.sql already deals > with that by redacting the number, and the attached top-up does the same, > so the case stays covered: > > NOTICE: cannot specify relation > "pg_temp_REDACTED.testpub_temptbl" in the publication EXCEPT clause > (This operation is not supported for temporary tables.) > > It passes on both branches, and the same block run from three sessions > at once, with temp schemas pg_temp_1, pg_temp_2 and pg_temp_3, prints the > same line in each. >
Thanks for sharing the testcase patch but I don't find compelling to add it along with current patch due to: (a) it is not necessary to use temp table to test this patch, (b) I am not sure we want to test all negative cases especially with some special handling though I am open to consider it separately as a test to increase code-coverage. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
