Hi, On Thu, 1 Oct 2026 at 09:48, Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2026 at 07:53:12AM +0530, Ayush Tiwari wrote: > > I've kept the helper, but now wait for the new checkpointer to install its > > signal handlers. The helper gets more time too. > > Hmm. I am not sure that we actually need to multiply by 4 the restore > timeout sent to the fake restore_command waiting for the shutdown. > Isn't that somewhat betraying the default value of Utils.pm?
Ahh the 4x was just headroom for the setup waits. > > You have a better feel for the backpatch risk here, so I'll defer to you.. > > HEAD-only feels like better sleep for the time being woth v19 being > close by. Better sleep sounds always good. Sounds good. > I have been doing a bunch of adjustments as of the attached, and that > seems to work properly. The buildfarm would be the final judge; the > CI looks OK with the new test at least. What do you think? Thanks for this. The patch looks good to me. I did multiple A/B testing and it works well. Regards, Ayush
