On Mon, Oct 05, 2026 at 07:32 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > I'm maybe just not seeing the value of the patch, then, that's all, so > I doubt that my opinion has any value.
That's fine, thanks for taking a look. > Please note that the community mailing lists follow the following > style in terms of message posting: Noted, sorry about that. Shihao, I'm moving the entry to Ready for Committer. The code and tests look good to me, and the question of whether -f should be able to override the check is left for the committer to decide. Regards, João Marcelo Em seg., 5 de out. de 2026 às 19:32, Michael Paquier <[email protected]> escreveu: > On Mon, Oct 05, 2026 at 12:04:14PM -0300, Joao Detomini wrote: > > Nothing to change from my side, v3 looks fine to me. I'll put it > > back to Needs review for now, since Michael hasn't said whether he's > > ok with -f not overriding the check. > > I'm maybe just not seeing the value of the patch, then, that's all, so > I doubt that my opinion has any value. > > Please note that the community mailing lists follow the following > style in terms of message posting: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Bottom-posting > -- > Michael >
