On Mon, Oct 5, 2026 at 8:35 PM Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> wrote: > I think the repeated creating/dropping is a bit wasteful though and we > don't need it. Wouldn't it make more sense to have all tests use CREATE > IF NOT EXISTS and then remove all the DROPs of it? We would end up > having the extension after the tests are run, but since the database is > specifically created to run the isolation tests, it's not a problem if > it remains there. The attached patch would do that. (I am proposing > this change just for pg20.)
+1 -# A foreign key check racing a rebuild of the index it resolves through. # # Pause the RI fast path before it locks the referenced table, allowing Removing the first line of the comment seems unnecessary? Regards, -- Fujii Masao
