Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2026 at 7:35 PM Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> However, even once that updates, we're going to have some problems.
>> Trying it locally, I see my animal complaining about updates from
>> REL_13_STABLE failing, which is unsurprising ... but how do we get
>> v13-or-before data into a shape that the patched code will accept?
> By backpatching to REL_13_STABLE? I see no other reasonable way, given
> the constraints.
That was my first reaction too, but then what are we testing?
Nothing corresponding to real-world upgrades.
Maybe we need to hot-wire the BF script to not run amcheck in these
upgrades from ancient versions.
regards, tom lane
