Hi Henson, Nik,

> This is not a blocker.  If you prefer the function form, it is fine
> as it is.

Thanks for reading the _nested helpers, Henson.  I'd like to keep the
function form in this patch.  The macro version would touch about 100
start/end pairs in 45 files plus the LWLock wrappers and errfinish(),
and it changes what end() does for every caller, extensions included.
I think that belongs in its own thread, and I'm happy to try it there
once this one is in.

> From the tester's side I consider v9 ready.

Thanks for the rerun, Nik, and for running v8 next to it as a control.

With both of your reviews in, I've moved the CF entry to Ready for
Committer.

v9 still applies cleanly to current master, so no new version.

Thanks,
Seongjun


Reply via email to