> On Nov 10, 2026, at 18:04, Etsuro Fujita <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2026 at 6:50 PM Etsuro Fujita <[email protected]> wrote:
>> As I understand it, you are saying we need to separate the version
>> parameter from statistical value parameters, but the comment for
>> import_attribute_statistics says:
>>
>> * Import attribute statistics from NullableDatum inputs for all statistical
>> * values.
>> *
>> * For now, the 'version' argument is ignored. In the future it can be used
>> * to interpret older statistics properly.
>>
>> So IMU I think we are using the term "statistical value parameters" to
>> include the version parameter. With that in mind, what I proposed is
>> not that bad...
>
> I mean the term "statistical values" includes a version value. Sorry.
>
> Best regards,
> Etsuro Fujita
I was considering the version parameter as metadata for the statistical values,
which could be used to distinguish between different sets of statistical
values. But I see your point now. Treating the version parameter as a
statistical value parameter also makes sense to me. No objection from my side.
Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/
