On 2018-Nov-08, Amit Kapila wrote: > Sure, but what are we going to achieve with that number? What > information user is going to get by that? If it can help us to ensure > that it has reset the expected number of statements, then I can see > the clear usage, but without that, the return value doesn't seem to > have any clear purpose. So, I don't see much value in breaking > compatibility. > > Does anyone else have an opinion on this matter?
This was proposed by Sergei Kornilov in https://postgr.es/m/3368121530260...@web21g.yandex.ru saying that "it would be nice" to return it. Maybe he has an use case in mind? I don't see one myself. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
