On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 4:07 AM Kevin Grittner <kgri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I would say this should be considered a resounding success. We should > probably add an alternative result file to cover this case, but > otherwise I don't see anything which requires action. > As of now, we've added an extra expected file for the same.
> Congratulations on making this work so well! > Thanks for developing the serializable module in a nice decoupled architecture. -- Thanks & Regards, Kuntal Ghosh EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
