> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 7:10 PM Chris Travers <chris.trav...@adjust.com> > wrote: > >> More generally, I'd like this material to be code comments. It's the >> kind of stuff that gets outdated before long if it's kept separate. > > The problem is that code comments are not going to be good places to document > "how do I check for pending actions?" That could be moved to the main SGML I > guess.....
I aggree with Peter here, for me it also feels more natural to have this information as code commentaries - at least if I would search for it that would be my first thought. As for "how do I..." part, I think there are alreasy similar commentaries in the code, which makes sense - this kind of questions usually appear when you're reading/writing some code. It doesn't look like there is much left to do in this discussion, but for now I'll move it to the next CF.
