On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 4:10 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:04:12AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote: > > There's hundreds of other internal uses of xlog that were not touched > > either, only the user-facing parts were changed. > > I have heard of them ;) > Just wondering if this one is worth renaming as the variable is > isolated. It is not a big deal to do nothing though.
Well, if we rename the user-visible part but not the internal part, then they don't match, which is odd. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
