>>>>> "Alvaro" == Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
Alvaro> After looking at the proposed grammar again today and in danger Alvaro> of repeating myself, IMO allowing the concurrency keyword to Alvaro> appear outside the parens would be a mistake. Valid commands: Alvaro> REINDEX (VERBOSE, CONCURRENTLY) TABLE foo; Alvaro> REINDEX (CONCURRENTLY) INDEX bar; We burned that bridge with CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY; to make REINDEX require different syntax would be too inconsistent. If we didn't have all these existing uses of CONCURRENTLY without parens, your argument might have more merit; but we do. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
