On 2018-12-31 21:35:57 +0000, Andrew Gierth wrote: > >>>>> "Alvaro" == Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > Alvaro> After looking at the proposed grammar again today and in danger > Alvaro> of repeating myself, IMO allowing the concurrency keyword to > Alvaro> appear outside the parens would be a mistake. Valid commands: > > Alvaro> REINDEX (VERBOSE, CONCURRENTLY) TABLE foo; > Alvaro> REINDEX (CONCURRENTLY) INDEX bar; > > We burned that bridge with CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY; to make REINDEX > require different syntax would be too inconsistent. > > If we didn't have all these existing uses of CONCURRENTLY without > parens, your argument might have more merit; but we do.
+1
