David Rowley <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> 1. I don't think having a table named "dual" makes a whole lot of
> sense for a table with a single row.
Well, I borrowed Oracle terminology there ;-)
> (Uppercasing these additions would also make them look less of an
> afterthought.)
Don't really care, can do.
> I also did a quick benchmark of v6 and found the slowdown to be
> smaller after the change made in build_simple_rel()
Thanks for confirming. I was not very sure that was worth the extra
few bytes of code space, but if you see a difference too, then it's
probably worthwhile.
regards, tom lane
