Stefan Keller wrote: > Pls. try to give DUAL a better name, since it's IMHO neither > self-explaining nor correct.
I agree with the sentiment. On the other hand, people who migrate from Oracle might be happy if there is a DUAL table that allows them to migrate some of their statements unmodified. I don't know if that is a good enough argument, though. Currently there is "orafce" which provides DUAL, and it might be good enough if it defines DUAL as a view on DUMMY. Yours, Laurenz Albe
