On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 15:29, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthali...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 9:33 AM Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > Regression tests that use \d+ to show the table details might > > not be interested specifically in table access method. But these will > > fail if run with a modified default access method. > > I see your point, but if a test is not interested specifically in a table am, > then I guess it wouldn't use a custom table am in the first place, right?
Right. It wouldn't use a custom table am. But I mean, despite not using a custom table am, the test would fail if the regression runs with a changed default access method, because the regression output file has only one particular am value output. > Anyway, I don't have strong opinion here, so if everyone agrees that > HIDE_TABLEAM > will show/hide access method unconditionally, I'm fine with that. Yeah, I agree it's subjective. -- Thanks, -Amit Khandekar EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company
