På lørdag 02. februar 2019 kl. 20:01:01, skrev Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us <mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>>: [snip] There's nothing particularly stopping us from accepting "materialized" with a D in this syntax, instead of or in addition to "materialize"; though I hesitate to mention it for fear of another round of bikeshedding. +1 for keeping it "imperative-style" – MATERIALIZE – consistent with other SQL-stuff. -- Andreas Joseph Krogh
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Tom Lane
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Michael Paquier
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Tom Lane
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Merlin Moncure
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Tom Lane
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Merlin Moncure
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Chapman Flack
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs David Fetter
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Tom Lane
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Tom Lane
- Sv: Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Andreas Joseph Krogh
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Andrew Gierth
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Tom Lane
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Tom Lane
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Peter Eisentraut
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Alvaro Herrera
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Merlin Moncure
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Tomas Vondra
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Tom Lane
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Jonathan S. Katz
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Tomas Vondra