On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:02 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On 2019-Feb-14, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > On 14/02/2019 16:11, Tom Lane wrote: > > > ... so, have we beaten this topic to death yet? Can we make a decision? > > > > > > Personally, I'd be happy with either of the last two patch versions > > > I posted (that is, either AS [[NOT] MATERIALIZED] or > > > AS [MATERIALIZE [ON|OFF]] syntax). But we gotta pick something. > > > > If we're not really planning to add any more options, I'd register a > > light vote for MATERIALIZED. It reads easier, seems more grammatically > > correct, and uses an existing word. > > +1 for MATERIALIZED, as I proposed in > https://postgr.es/m/20170503173305.fetj4tz7kd56tjlr@alvherre.pgsql
Seconded! merlin
