On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 10:53:02PM +1300, David Rowley wrote: > On Fri, 11 May 2018 at 17:37, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> > wrote: > > 5. The last sentence in caveats, that is, > > > > "Partitioning using these techniques will work well with up to perhaps a > > hundred partitions; don't try to use many thousands of partitions." > > > > should perhaps be reworded as: > > > > "So the legacy inheritance based partitioning will work well with up to > > perhaps a hundred partitions; don't try to use many thousands of > > partitions."
> In the -general post, I was just about to point them at the part in > the documents that warn against these large partition hierarchies, but > it looks like the warning was removed in bebc46931a1, or at least > modified to say that constraint exclusion with heritance tables is > slow. I really wonder if we shouldn't put something back in there to > warn against this sort of thing. +1 I believe I was of the same mind when I wrote: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20180525215002.GD14378%40telsasoft.com#c9de33b17fe63cecad4ac30fb1662531 Justin PS. Sorry to dredge up another 10 month old thread..
