On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 05:32:57PM +0200, David Fetter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 11:57:35AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Also, instead of storing the file name and block number in the modblock > > file, using the database oid, relfilenode, and block number (3 int32 > > values) should be sufficient. > > Would doing it that way constrain the design of new table access > methods in some meaningful way?
I think these are the values used in WAL, so I assume table access methods already have to map to those, unless they use their own. I actually don't know. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
