Hi, On 2019-04-18 11:34:32 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 05:32:57PM +0200, David Fetter wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 11:57:35AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Also, instead of storing the file name and block number in the modblock > > > file, using the database oid, relfilenode, and block number (3 int32 > > > values) should be sufficient. > > > > Would doing it that way constrain the design of new table access > > methods in some meaningful way? > > I think these are the values used in WAL, so I assume table access > methods already have to map to those, unless they use their own. > I actually don't know.
I don't think it'd be a meaningful restriction. Given that we use those for shared_buffer descriptors, WAL etc. Greetings, Andres Freund
