Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2019-04-30 14:41:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think trying to get this "working" is a v13 task now. We've obviously
>> never tried to stress the case before, so you're neither fixing a
>> regression nor fixing a new-in-v12 issue.
> Well, the test *do* test that a previously existing all-branches bug
> doesn't exist, no (albeit one just triggering an assert)? I'm not
> talking about making this concurrency safe, just about whether it's
> possible to somehow keep the tests.
Well, I told you what I thought was a safe way to run the tests.
regards, tom lane
