Greetings, * Andres Freund (and...@anarazel.de) wrote: > On 2019-08-05 12:43:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > On the other hand, people have also opined that they want full error > > checking on the inserted values, and that seems out of reach with less > > than a full running system (mumble extensions mumble). > > I think the error checking ought to be about as complete as the one we > do during a normal postmaster startup. Afaict that requires loading > shared_preload_library extensions, but does *not* require booting up far > enough to run GUC checks in a context with database access.
I'm not following this thread of the discussion. You're not suggesting that pg_basebackup perform this error checking after it modifies the file, are you..? Where are you thinking this error checking would be happening? Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
