Yuli Khodorkovskiy <yuli.khodorkovs...@crunchydata.com> writes:
> Ah, now I remember why I didn't add regressions to the original patch.
> As stated at the top of the thread, the "db_table: { truncate }"
> permission does not currently exist in refpolicy. A workaround would
> be to add the policy with CIL, but that adds unneeded complexity to
> the regressions. I think the correct path forward is:
> 1) Get the sepgsql changes in without policy/regressions
> 2) Send a patch to refpolicy for the new permission
> 3) Once Redhat updates the selinux-policy-targeted RPM to include the
> new permissions, I will send an update to the sepgsql regressions and
> policy.
That's going to be a problem. I do not think it will be acceptable
to commit tests that fail on less-than-bleeding-edge SELinux.
regards, tom lane
