On 9/6/19 8:07 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> writes: >> On 9/6/19 2:18 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> sepgsql hasn't worked on RHEL6 in a long time, if ever; it requires >>> a newer version of libselinux than what ships in RHEL6. So I'm not >>> concerned about that. We do need to worry about RHEL7, and whatever >>> is the oldest version of Fedora that is running the sepgsql tests >>> in the buildfarm. > >> I could be wrong, but as far as I know rhinoceros is the only buildfarm >> animal running sepgsql tests. > > It seems reasonable to define RHEL7 as the oldest SELinux version we > still care about. But it'd be a good idea for somebody to be running > a fairly bleeding-edge Fedora animal with sepgsql enabled, so we get > coverage of the other end of the scale.
Yeah -- I was planning to eventually register a RHEL8 animal, but I should probably do one for Fedora as well. I'll bump the priority for that on my personal TODO. Joe -- Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
