> > I did not read the patch but run the same case what you have given and > I can see the similar improvement with the patch. > With the patch 8832.988, without the patch 10252.701ms (median of three > reading) >
Possibly you had debug symbols enabled? With debug symbols enabled I also get about similar number 10136.839 with patch vs 12900.044 ms without the patch. Regards, Jeevan Ladhe
