Correction - On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 3:11 PM Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan.la...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> I ran your testcase and on my VM I get numbers like 3593.801 ms > without patch and 3593.801 with the patch, average of 5 runs each. > The runs were quite consistent. > 3593.801 ms without patch and 3213.809 with the patch, approx. 10% gain. Regards, Jeevan Ladhe
