On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 06:03:06PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > I have begun looking at this one.
Another question I have: do we need to care more about other extra ACLs applied to other object types? For example a subset of columns on a table with a column being renamed could be an issue. Procedure renamed in core are not that common still we did it. Here is another idea I have regarding this set of problems. We could use pg_depend on the source for system objects and join it with pg_init_privs, and then compare it with the entries of the target based on the descriptions generated by pg_describe_object(). If there is an object renamed or an unmatching signature, then we would immediately find about it, for any object types. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
