On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 05:53:16PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Not arguing against the fact that it is useful, but I'd think that it > is a two-step process, where we need to understand what logic needs to > be in the backend or some frontend: > 1) Warn properly about the objects involved, where the object > description returned by pg_describe_object would be fine enough to > understand what's broken in a given database. > 2) Generate a script which may be used by the end-user.
So, we have here a patch with no updates from the authors for the last two months. Anastasia, Arthur, are you still interested in this problem? Gregory has provided a review lately and has pointed out some issues. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
