On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 09:46:48AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Yeah; I don't think it's *that* unlikely for it to happen again. But > my own principal concern about this mirrors what somebody else already > pointed out: the one-major-release-per-year schedule is not engraved on > any stone tablets. So I don't want to go to a release numbering system > that depends on us doing it that way for the rest of time.
Yeah, it is good to keep some flexibility here, so my take is that there is little advantage in changing again the version numbering. Note that any change like that induces an extra cost for anybody maintaining builds of Postgres or any upgrade logic where the decision depends on the version number of the origin build and the target build. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
