RE: Use of "long" in incremental sort code

[Tang, Haiying]

Hi

Found one more place needed to be changed(long -> int64).

Also changed the output for int64 data(Debug mode on & define EXEC_SORTDEBUG )

And, maybe there's a typo in " src\backend\executor\nodeIncrementalSort.c" as 
below.
Obviously, the ">=" is meaningless, right?

-               SO1_printf("Sorting presorted prefix tuplesort with >= %ld 
tuples\n", nTuples);
+               SO1_printf("Sorting presorted prefix tuplesort with %ld 
tuples\n", nTuples);

Please take a check at the attached patch file.

Previous disscution:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAApHDvpky%2BUhof8mryPf5i%3D6e6fib2dxHqBrhp0Qhu0NeBhLJw%40mail.gmail.com

Best regards
Tang

0001-Use-int64-instead-of-long-for-space-used-variables-a.patch
Description: 0001-Use-int64-instead-of-long-for-space-used-variables-a.patch