Greetings, * David G. Johnston (david.g.johns...@gmail.com) wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:42 AM Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > The downside is you end up with X-1 dummy sections just to allow for > > references to old syntax, and you then have to find them all and remove > > them when you implement the proper solution. I have no intention of > > applying such an X-1 fix. > > X = 2; seems like a strong objection for such a minor issue. The status > quo seems worse than that.
I've been thinking about this and I think I'm on Craig and David's side- having something cleaner, and clearer, than just http redirects and such would be good for these cases and I don't think we are going to end up with so many of them that it ends up becoming an issue. Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
