Isn't the sense of "reset" inverted ?
I think maybe you mean to do set_ps_display(""); in the "if reset".
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:54:22PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> +update_checkpoint_display(int flags, bool restartpoint, bool reset)
> +{
> + if (reset)
> + {
> + char activitymsg[128];
> +
> + snprintf(activitymsg, sizeof(activitymsg), "performing %s%s%s",
> + (flags & CHECKPOINT_END_OF_RECOVERY) ?
> "end-of-recovery " : "",
> + (flags & CHECKPOINT_IS_SHUTDOWN) ? "shutdown "
> : "",
> + restartpoint ? "restartpoint" : "checkpoint");
> + set_ps_display(activitymsg);
> + }
> + else
> + set_ps_display("");
> +}
> +
> +
> /*
> * Perform a checkpoint --- either during shutdown, or on-the-fly
> *
> @@ -8905,6 +8937,9 @@ CreateCheckPoint(int flags)
> if (log_checkpoints)
> LogCheckpointStart(flags, false);
>
> + /* Update the process title */
> + update_checkpoint_display(flags, false, false);
> +
> TRACE_POSTGRESQL_CHECKPOINT_START(flags);
>
> /*
> @@ -9120,6 +9155,9 @@ CreateCheckPoint(int flags)
> /* Real work is done, but log and update stats before releasing lock. */
> LogCheckpointEnd(false);
>
> + /* Reset the process title */
> + update_checkpoint_display(flags, false, true);
> +
> TRACE_POSTGRESQL_CHECKPOINT_DONE(CheckpointStats.ckpt_bufs_written,
>
> NBuffers,
>
> CheckpointStats.ckpt_segs_added,
> @@ -9374,6 +9412,9 @@ CreateRestartPoint(int flags)
> if (log_checkpoints)
> LogCheckpointStart(flags, true);
>
> + /* Update the process title */
> + update_checkpoint_display(flags, true, false);
> +
> CheckPointGuts(lastCheckPoint.redo, flags);
>
> /*
> @@ -9492,6 +9533,9 @@ CreateRestartPoint(int flags)
> /* Real work is done, but log and update before releasing lock. */
> LogCheckpointEnd(true);
>
> + /* Reset the process title */
> + update_checkpoint_display(flags, true, true);
> +
> xtime = GetLatestXTime();
> ereport((log_checkpoints ? LOG : DEBUG2),
> (errmsg("recovery restart point at %X/%X",
