On 12/11/20, 4:00 PM, "Michael Paquier" <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 06:54:42PM +0000, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
>> This approach seems reasonable to me. I've attached my take on it.
>
> + /* Reset the process title */
> + set_ps_display("");
> I would still recommend to avoid calling set_ps_display() if there is
> no need to so as we avoid useless system calls, so I think that this
> stuff had better use a common path for the set and reset logic.
>
> My counter-proposal is like the attached, with the set/reset part not
> reversed this time, and the code indented :p
Haha. LGTM.
Nathan
